Article contributed by Ian Pfingsten, Plant Conservation Biologist, Special Projects Program
Oregon’s
flora and fauna face a no-analog future climate, a climate where environments
are changing faster than many species have ever experienced. If we maintain business as usual, then by
2100, the average annual temperature of the Pacific Northwest will rise by at
least 6 °F due to increasing greenhouse gasses. Climate models disagree on future average
annual rainfall in the Pacific Northwest, but most predict lower average summer
rainfall by the end of this century. Thus
drier and hotter growing seasons are projected for many of Oregon’s native species,
of which rare plants and their dependents may be at most risk from this rapid
climatic shift.
![]() |
Flowering capitulum
of Snake River goldenweed (Pyrrocoma
radiata). Photo credits to Tom Kaye. |
IAE ecologists Ian Pfingsten and Tom Kaye are
currently assessing the potential impact of changing climates on seven rare
Oregon natives (six plant species and one butterfly species) by identifying
which aspects of the climate appear to control the populations of these
species. This approach uses Climate
Driven Population Models.
More
precisely, they’re looking for climate drivers that affect the rate of growth,
survival and fertility of the organisms they’re studying, and then linking
these climate variables to population models.
This allows them to project these species population sizes into two
possible futures: one with a changing (forecast) climate and one with a stable
(observed) climate.
They’re finding that growing season evapotranspiration
(rate of water loss through evaporation and plant transpiration), which increases
with temperature, strongly correlates with many species’ population changes. Unfortunately for these endangered species,
evapotranspiration is forecasted to increase as future temperatures rise, and
that may push some species to extinction faster than predicted under stable
climates. Even populations that are
expected to increase under stable climates are projected to decrease with
higher average summer evapotranspiration.
The
species currently being examined include Tygh Valley milkvetch, Snake River
goldenweed, Green’s mariposa lily, shaggy horkelia, Bradshaw’s lomatium, Cook’s
lomatium, and Fender’s blue butterfly.
An example of a plant species at
increased risk due to climate change is the state-listed endangered Snake River
goldenweed (Pyrrocoma radiata), which
is located along the border of Oregon and Idaho where climate is more arid than
in the Willamette Valley. Preliminary
findings from this approach show that spring evapotranspiration is negatively
associated with plant growth and survival, but positively associated with plant
fertility, which denotes a trade-off between growth and reproduction. Preliminary findings with future simulations
into 2100 project faster population declines under climate change than under
stable climate at all of our study sites. Of particular importance in the
rangeland habitat the species occupies, the populations seem to fare better
under climate change when excluded from large mammal herbivory, suggesting an
interaction between climate change and disturbance.
This project is supported by the Bureau of Land Management and we're grateful for their support.
Wondering about your claim that by "2100 the average annual temperature of the (PNW) will rise by at least 6F...". With a high degree of variation present in all current climate models, presenting a range of possible future temperatures (some lower than the 6F cited, others higher), I find this article's certain claim of an increase of "at least" 6F suspect. Source? Based on the variation(s) presented by various computer climate models, the actual rise could be significantly less (or more) than this...nowhere can I find support of the notion of "at least" 6F: this demonstrates a degree of certainty that even the modelers themselves do not hold.
ReplyDeleteI apologize for the lack of sources. I will see if I can get them posted.
DeleteThat claim is based off of the SRES A2 emissions scenario (a.k.a. "business as usual") using the CMIP3 climate models. This is presented in the 2013 Northwest Climate Assessment Report (fig. 2.7), which you can read in full here:
http://occri.net/reports
The SRES A2 scenario is a lower radiative forcing scenario than the RCP 8.5 scenario from the newer CMIP5 climate models. Plus, A2 is considered a conservative scenario because our observed emissions are surpassing its projected emissions.
http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.com/default.html
You can also look at custom climate comparisons at this site where I gather my downscaled projections:
http://nimbus.cos.uidaho.edu/MACA/
Thanks for this Ian, much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing, nice post! Post really provice useful information!
ReplyDeleteGiaonhan247 chuyên dịch vụ mua hàng nhật và giải đáp aliexpress là gì cũng như alibaba là gì và tổng hợp các web mua hàng giảm giá và giải đáp mua hàng trên amazon có đảm bảo không uy tín không.
I think it should be a good opportunity to get feedback from others who are experienced.
ReplyDelete경마사이트
메이저사이트
This article is quite interesting and I am looking forward to reading more of your posts. Thanks for sharing this article with us. 바둑이사이트넷
ReplyDeleteI wanna say thank you for providing this great information. Great job
ReplyDelete카지노사이트위키
온라인카지노사이트
카지노사이트탑
바카라사이트
It’s always a pleasure to read this magnificent articles on this site.
ReplyDelete카지노사이트
온라인카지노
카지노
바카라